You guys, prior to reading Emily Dickensen’s poems, I knew nothing about her. Perhaps it was a flaw in my education, or my individual studies, but for realz, nothing, nada, everything we talked about in class surprised me.
Which brings me to, THOSE CRAZIES. Do you have to be crazy to write good poetry?
I can’t even imagine living Emily’s life, but also I view her life from a completely different context. Of course living in a time when women’s only job was to be home maker and not a intellect could make it easy for a writer like Emily to be a recluse.
More importantly if she wasn’t a crazy would her poetry be as genius as it is?? I say no. My evidence to support his claim is… name a poet who isn’t crazy!
This is how I imagine crazy writers. |
Part of being a crazy poet I think just lends to the theme of death in said poetry, which there is plenty of in her poetry. What interests me most is her first and last poems in out collection, 39/49 and 1773/1772… incidentally the first and the last seem to me to be saying the same thing… having come close to death twice but never made it. In her last it makes sense that she is further speaking to her third experience with death: “if Immortality unveil/ A third event to me” (91). Her focus on the next encounter with death is much different than her first account of the first two, when she feels robbed having been twice so close, but never reaching heaven: “Angels- twice descending/ Reimbursed my store-/ Burglar! Banker – Father!/ I am poor once more!” (78).
These quotes bring me to my final thought, GOD I WISH I COULD THROW MY DASHES AROUND LIKE HER. Dashes are so brilliant but aren’t used enough! I was so thrilled to find a writer who likes them, seemingly, as much as I do!
He looks so happy being a dash! ... That's because they're awesome. |